Ever since Karl Jaspers's "axial age" paradigm, there have been a number of influential studies comparing ancient East Asian and Greco-Roman history and culture. However, to date there has been no comparative study involving multiple literary traditions in these cultural spheres. This book compares the dynamics between the younger literary cultures of Japan and Rome and the lit...(展开全部)

Ever since Karl Jaspers's "axial age" paradigm, there have been a number of influential studies comparing ancient East Asian and Greco-Roman history and culture. However, to date there has been no comparative study involving multiple literary traditions in these cultural spheres. This book compares the dynamics between the younger literary cultures of Japan and Rome and the lit...(展开全部)

弗里茨·舒尔茨（1879—1957），德国法学家、历史学家、罗马法著名学者，与卡泽尔、维亚克尔和昆克尔齐名，被誉为20世纪重要的罗马法学者之一。舒尔茨的罗马法三部曲——《古典罗马法》《罗马法原则》和《罗马法学史》——影响了几代学人，至今仍有重要价值。其中，《古典罗马法》是优秀的罗马法教科书，《罗马法原则》是继耶林的《罗马法精神》之后在这一主题上唯一的杰作，《罗马法学史》至今仍没有可替代的作品。 柯伟才，广西合浦人，毕业于北京航空航天大学法学院民商法学专业，获博士学位。现任教于苏州大学王健法学院，主要研究方向：民法与罗马法。

In this, the first comprehensive one-volume survey of the economies of classical antiquity, twenty-eight chapters summarise the current state of scholarship in their specialised fields and sketch new directions for research. The approach taken is both thematic, with chapters on the underlying determinants of economic performance, and chronological, with coverage of the whole of...(展开全部)

In this, the first comprehensive one-volume survey of the economies of classical antiquity, twenty-eight chapters summarise the current state of scholarship in their specialised fields and sketch new directions for research. The approach taken is both thematic, with chapters on the underlying determinants of economic performance, and chronological, with coverage of the whole of...(展开全部)

Why should the earliest literary encounters between China and the United States—and their critical interpretation—matter now? How can they help us describe cultural exchanges in which nothing substantial is exchanged, at least not in ways that can easily be tracked? All sorts of literary meetings took place between China and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentie...(展开全部)

Why should the earliest literary encounters between China and the United States—and their critical interpretation—matter now? How can they help us describe cultural exchanges in which nothing substantial is exchanged, at least not in ways that can easily be tracked? All sorts of literary meetings took place between China and the United States in the nineteenth and early twentie...(展开全部)